Tony Anderson Interview - WMPD June 22, 2007

MLHoney,
Try another browser, as Sky suggested. I have found Firefox to be much more user friendly with regards to video playback, it is way more secure than IE, and requires fewer updates. Find the free download at Mozilla.com.

A few things stick out to me from Mr. Anderson's testimony...
1) He seems to think something was tied up to the tree root. I don't recall this theory from anywhere else. Did he testify to that way back in the day? For a latent-print specialist to recall such a minute detail from all those years ago, and yet he can't remember what type of camera he used?????

2) He believes the amount of blood detected by the luminol indicates that something "bled out" there? Haven't we already figured out that the blood remains were nowhere near the amount that would have been present if the ditch bank was the scene of the crime?

3) Would this "list" of people he compared the print to not be part of the evidence files? I don't recall that list being discussed.......

4) Would the discovery of such a print at a "crime scene" not warrant an attempt to make a "cast" of it in some fashion, rather than depend on a photo of it?

I must be getting old...his testimony reeks of rehearsal/coaching/bias/______________(fill in the blank)